Monday, January 27, 2014

Elvis, The Beatles, The Sex Pistols, Nirvana, and...Anyone Else?

I teach 3rd grade and I love it.  One reason is that, in addition to teaching reading and writing and math and history, I get chances to teach kids about culture and, especially, music. Some girls in my class were recently referring to the current teeny-bopper flavor-of-the-month band One Direction as “the new Beatles.”  “No,” I said. “They are not the ‘new Beatles.’” “Whhhyyyyy?  What do you meeeeaaaan?” the girls whined.  “Because they sing very nicely, but they aren’t gonna change the world.  The Beatles CHANGED THE WORLD!” I pontificated, pounding a desk for emphasis.  In the entire history of rock and roll, I think, really, only four rock and roll artists can be said to have done this.  Many great ones have changed music in general and rock and roll in particular, but only four have really CHANGED THE WORLD.

ELVIS
Yes, we all know he was a poor white kid with a great voice who had absorbed white and black southern musical traditions and was able to stir them up in a magical and wonderful kind of way.  But he was more than a just a musician: Elvis was a hurricane that tore across our entire culture.  His hip-swiveling appearance on the Ed Sullivan Show in September of 1956 didn’t simply announce the invention of a brand new musical genre.  In one fell swoop it both electrified and terrified the entire country and world: Elvis’s game pushed issues of sex, gender, and race to the fore, proclaimed clearly that these things were on young peoples’ minds, and demonstrated that the giant group of young people electrified by his performance was destined to challenge and, indeed, dynamite, traditional mores along these lines and many others.  Indeed, he was the first to galvanize these forces.  Elvis changed the world.

THE BEATLES
The rock and roll explosion set off by Elvis triggered a flood of great music in its wake: Chuck Berry, Buddy Holly, Carl Perkins, Bill Haley, etc etc etc.  The questions about racial integration and teen sexuality raised by the music terrified the Establishment and most adults hoped rock and roll was a fad that would just go away.  Apparently beginning to fulfill these hopes, the music had started to stagnate early 1960s.  Marketing forces diluted the sound by placing toned down rock and roll songs—with edgy blues rhythms and melodies and suggestive lyrics filtered out into the hands of more palatable bland crooners like Pat Boone.  In truth, as of 1960, rock and roll lyrically had never really moved beyond the “girls and cars” phase.  Bob Dylan hitchhiked to New York City from Minnesota and burst upon the folk scene in Greenwich Village in 1961 with songs that raised Woody Guthrie’s songwriting ethos to another level and into the political causes of the times, but Dylan’s folkies in NYC wanted nothing to do with rock and roll and were a niche music market, rather than a mainstream cultural force, anyway. 

The Beatles, however, were something else.  John Lennon got a lot of crap for saying “The Beatles are more popular than Jesus,’ but he was pretty well spot-on.  Bouncing, once again, onto Ed Sullivan’s stage in February 1964, the world shook at their feet.  While lyrically, the early Beatles songs generally hewed close to traditional subjects (“I Wanna Hold Your Hand,” “Please Please Me,” “Can’t Buy Me Love”), musically the band was crafting more complex song forms and moving beyond the blues based chord and melody structures of early rock and roll.  They were ubiquitous— their records dominated the radio and covered record store racks and walls, of course, but their faces also appeared constantly on TV, newspapers, magazines and their look, with their hair creeping ever closer to their shoulders, raised a clear middle finger to the establishment, which once again began to get nervous.  By 1966, their songwriting had completely exploded the definition and scope of rock and roll, lyrically and musically, and in the process transformed the role of not only the music but of the people who create it and listen it.  By the time “Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band” was released, rock and roll songs could address pretty much any topic, idea, issue or question  social and political commentary, addiction, old age, war, peace, education, parents, children, etc etc etc.  These songs gave voice to ideas and feelings in many young (and older) people’s hearts and minds and thereby empowered them to come together (!) and act on these feelings and ideas.  The Beatles transformed rock and roll from a quaint musical fad or genre to an art form and a vehicle for social change, and also expressed the outlook of an entire generation and empowered that generation and generations of young people ever after to stand up for their ideals.  The Beatles changed the world.

THE SEX PISTOLS…
…only existed for about 15 seconds, but they also changed the world.  Once again, despite the unbelievable explosion set off by the Beatles in the 1960s, mainstream rock and roll had become bloated and stagnant by the mid 1970s.  Some wonderful records were made during that stretch—indeed, many of my favorites (“Exile on Main Street,” anyone?)—but the sense that music or young people could or would change the world had given way to simply a “let’s party” mentality.  Rock stars staged mammoth tours and were worshipped like gods by stoned suburban kids flocking to giant arenas to see them, and all the while record companies raked in millions of dollars.  It was a business, a gravy train—running just fine, but not really a force for cultural  change. 

Then onto the scene, from the depths of depressed corners and backalleys of London, come the Sex Pistols—an unholy mess of safety pins and fury.  Flipping the bird at absolutely everything and ripping out of the radio with raging guitar hooks which frame lyrics bearing social commentary way more iron fisted than anything Bob Dylan ever wrote, the Pistols instantly gave voice to the forgotten underclass and scared the hell out of everyone else (their famous first TV appearance was, like the Beatles’ and Elvis’s, a cultural landmark moment, though for very different reasons).  They made, really, one album (yes, a few people have managed to cobble together a few other odds and ends, but they made one album, really) and imploded by the end of their only tour across America.  However, by the end of that tour, the forces of punk had been unleashed on the culture.  Underclass kids in the UK, USA, and elsewhere had been ignored and trod upon for a long time, were mighty pissed off about many things, and had been so for awhile, but now had a voice and were demanding to be reckoned with.  These people, somehow previously hiding or lurking or waiting in the shadows to come out, were suddenly everywhere—you couldn’t and still can’t walk down a street without seeing palpable traces of the punk ethos and experience: spiked hair, leather boots or jackets, piercings, body ink, etc all expressing a sense of disconnection with the stifling conventions and socioeconomic inequalities of the dominant culture.  Dozens of great bands followed in the Pistols wake—the Clash, the Dead Kennedys, etc etc etc—but it was the Pistols who, in just a few seconds, opened the door and gave voice to a whole generation of forgotten and overlooked people.  The Sex Pistols changed the world.

NIRVANA
By now you know the cycle:  after a ground-shaking cultural change set off by a world-changing trailblazer and followed by many other strong artists, rock and roll stagnates.  The 80s were the ultimate in rock and roll stagnation.  Punk had been stolen out of the hands of angry misfits and underclass rebels and turned into electronic pap performed by people who spent more on their “spiked” hairdos and pre-torn t-shirts and jeans than on their instruments.  Hell, most radio songs through the 80s didn’t even have a drummer—just some casio drum machine thing like you hear on cheezy organ store demos.  The music had no grit or grind, didn’t threaten anyone in any way, addressed no real issues lyrically, and was mostly like white bread soaked in milted vanilla ice cream—bland blah blech.  Yes, there were occasionally musical signs of life (thank god for the Red Hot Chili Peppers!).  Yes, there was Live Aid and “We Are The World,” which were nice one-offs but mostly rock star PR photo ops in the end—not really movement starters. And yes, U2 purported to have a social conscience, but I’ve gotta say that Bono lost me when, after paying $15 for the Rattle and Hum CD and $10 to get into the movie, I watched him on the screen in front of a football stadium of 75,000 people who had paid $50 or so per ticket and $20 for t-shirts sermonize about TV priests milking money out of people—what a load of crap.  If rock and roll wasn’t dead as a music and as a cultural force, then the priest was there in its room administering the Last Rites. 

And then, seemingly out of fuckin’ nowhere comes Nirvana.  On my walk this afternoon, I listened to a bootleg of them at Chicago’s legendary Cabaret Metro recorded just weeks after Nevermind was released, right at the very beginning of the time the record, and thus the band, were starting to break.  The document is one of the most arresting recordings I’ve ever heard—imagine a B52 revving its engines at the beginning of a runway before takeoff.  They were on to something much larger than themselves and they knew it.  The band had a new, raw sound which grabbed you by the throat, inward and outward looking lyrics which articulated a significant set of experiences, reactions, and observations common to a new set of young people in ways that were new, funny, painful, frank, and keenly insightful, and a general aesthetic—jeans, flannel shirts, a kind of modest, understated  regular lookthat placed the emphasis on their work and disposed of all the idolatry and outward appearance crapola that had become more important than the musical or lyrical ideas expressed by purported punks, hippies, and other rock and roll musicians.  Like Elvis, the Beatles, and the Sex Pistols, Nirvana had a new musical vision that articulated and established a voice for a whole generation of young people.  The door now open, many great artists followed shortly—Pearl Jam, the Smashing Pumpkins, Liz Phair, etc etc etc. Again, suddenly not only was the music everywhere (and wow, was that music something—pure, intense, respectful and inclusive of traditions that it was also altering or even blowing up, honest, unapologetic, witty, literate, and completely unlike anything ever heard before), and not only was Nirvana on every radio and TV station, newspaper, magazine, and T-shirt, but suddenly the concerns of the entire generation they were speaking for—raised on consumerism, surrounded by scary, creepy news stories, etc etc etc—had to be reckoned with.  Like Elvis, the Beatles, and the Sex Pistols before them, they had not only pushed rock and roll music into new territory, but had also brought an entire group of people’s feelings and concerns to the fore.  Nirvana changed the world.

ANYONE ELSE…???
There are dozens, hundreds, perhaps even thousands of other great rock and roll artists, but I think all of them were able to do what they did because these four opened doors, blazed new territories, established legitimate audiences on large scales, and remade not only the musical but the entire cultural landscapes of their times.  These four are on the top shelf, methinks, all by themselves.  One Direction is NOT the new Beatles.  I challenge you, dear readers, to make a case for anyone else in rock and roll.

I think, also, a similar “world changer” statement might be made about one or two hip hop / rap artists, but I’m not familiar enough with the field to know for sure which one— Public Enemy, Run DMC, The Beastie Boys, or____________???—was really the world changer.    Please edify me as you see fit.

Thanks for reading.
Peace, Love, and Rock and Roll
mk

No comments:

Post a Comment